top of page

Moderate

Material Deep Dive

Silk

Silk earns a mid-range FSI sustainability score of 56 because its strong water performance (based on a Thai handwoven silk water-footprint study) and natural biodegradability are offset by a very high cradle-to-gate carbon footprint and moderate levels of pollution and chemical use in typical wet processing.

Animal

Virgin

End of Life

2+ years

85/100
Chemical Use

Moderate

60/100
Pollution

Moderate

60/100
Water Usage

601 L/kg

97/100
Carbon Footprint

18.7 kg CO₂/kg

2/100
Considerations

Very high carbon footprint from energy-intensive processing

Traditional production kills silkworms—an ethical concern for some

Processing uses chemicals that can pollute if not well managed

Expensive and limited availability of certified options

Strengths

Uses very little water in production

Biodegradable and won't shed plastic microfibres

Durable when cared for properly

Strong for its weight, requiring less material

Carbon Footprint Analysis

2/100

Silk produces approximately 18.7 kg CO₂-equivalent per kilogram of fiber.

The Data

Carbon Footprint

18.7 kg CO₂/kg

FSI Carbon Score

2/100

Sources: Higg Materials Sustainability Index, Textile Exchange Preferred Fiber Report

Sustainability Breakdown

Microplastic risk

None

Care level

Delicate

Available certifications

GOTS (organic silk), OEKO-TEX, bluesign, EU Ecolabel

Key properties

very soft, lightweight, breathable, strong for its weight, drapey, temperature regulating, biodegradable, low microplastic risk

Common uses

dresses, blouses, scarves, ties, lingerie, sleepwear, luxury knitwear, formalwear, bedding, accessories

Also known as

mulberry silk, cultivated silk, Bombyx mori silk, filament silk

Silk quick guide

Last updated: February 2026

How we scoreScore your garment now
bottom of page